Home
Next: 4 ISO 9001 certified calibration
Up: Topics in Metrology top
Previous: 2 ISO 9001, ISO 17025, calibration
  Contents
Subsections
A perusal of the archives of the ISO 17025 international email
discussion list[5] suggests that there is
substantial disagreement amongst the experts concerning the
components of calibration. Much of the disagreement concerns
adjustment. Some instruments and reference materials, e.g.
mercury-in-glass thermometers, gauge blocks, standard resistors,
cannot be adjusted if they are found to be out of spec at
calibration. Many instruments, however, can be adjusted to make
the indicated value equal to the standard value, within the
uncertainty of the instrument. In this topic we discuss pros and
cons of adjustment as part of a calibration process.
Various circumstances may be associated with a given calibration.
- The customer might be monitoring the long-term stability of
the instrument (e.g. as part of a process for determining
calibration intervals) and
adjustment might confound the stability analysis. In this case an
acceptable outcome might simply comprise a calibration
certificate with a table of indicated vs standard values or
corrections.
- The customer might simply want the instrument returned
`in specification' and leave any adjustment decision up to the
calibration lab. ISO 17025 (section 5.10.4.3) advises that if
an instrument is adjusted the lab should report `as found' or
`before adjustment' values, and `as left' or `after adjustment'
values on the calibration certificate. This information
should allow some analysis of stability to be performed
post-calibration, but might increase the costs of calibration.
- An adjustable instrument might deviate from the
reference by a large proportion (e.g. 80-90%) of the
instrument's specified uncertainty. This instrument is
technically within specification, but if left unadjusted,
might drift out of specification soon after the calibration,
resulting in problems for the user that may be detected only
one year later. Customers who are aware of this possibility
sometimes request adjustment only if the indicated value
deviates from the standard value by more than a pre-determined
proportion of the tolerance. Some calibration labs have
standard procedures which specify the conditions under which
in-tolerance adjustments should be made.
For completeness we briefly discuss non-adjustable instruments.
The calibration certificate of non-adjustable items may contain
various items of information depending on the calibration lab
operating procedures and the customer's requests.
- A simple `in specification' or `out of specification'
report may be given. In this case the user is not able to
analyse the stability of the instrument or reference material.
ISO 17025 accredited labs, however, are obliged to keep
detailed records of all such calibrations (section 5.10.4.2),
so clients should be able to obtain those details after the
event.
- The calibration certificate may contain a table of
indicated values vs standard values, or corrections vs
indicated values, or both.
It is important that the customer discuss with the calibration
laboratory, before work commences, the details of any adjustment
procedure to be followed during the calibration.
©2002 Martin Turner B.Sc. (Eng) Ph.D.
Engineering and Measurement Consultant
12 Goodman Place, Cherrybrook, NSW 2126, Australia
Tel: 0403-007 305 (International: +61-403-007 305)
Email: mjturner at biccard.com
Disclaimer The views expressed and information provided in
these documents are the opinions of the authors and do not
represent specific advice on any topic.
First published: 8 Sept 02 Last
modified: 2 Oct 02
Home
Next: 4 ISO 9001 certified calibration
Up: Topics in Metrology top
Previous: 2 ISO 9001, ISO 17025, calibration
  Contents
2003-11-09